Hi Virginia,
I actually ran into the same question earlier today.
I think the reason they use 10% × 1.20M€ × 40% instead of 10% × 1.32M€ × 40% is because we’re only calculating the incremental gross profit generated by the new sales due to the synergy (i.e., the 10% sales uplift). So:
- 1.20M€ is the original (pre-synergy) revenue of Company B.
- The 10% growth leads to 0.12M€ in new revenue.
- Applying the 40% margin (which is the new, improved margin post-acquisition) gives 0.048M€ in incremental gross profit.
Using 1.32M€ would capture the entire post-merger sales value, which includes the baseline revenue that was already there before the synergy — so it would overstate the synergy benefit.
I hope that helps :)
Best,
Lorin